<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CustomerGauge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://customergauge.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://customergauge.com</link>
	<description>Measure, Understand and Respond with CustomerGauge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avoiding a Night in the Barrel: What businesses can learn from the US Navy Greenie Board by Jan Schmidt-Wussow</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2012/01/avoiding-a-night-in-the-barrel-what-businesses-can-learn-from-the-us-navy-greenie-board/comment-page-1/#comment-6368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Schmidt-Wussow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=2332#comment-6368</guid>
		<description>Hello Adam, hello Rob,

what an excellent way to add some excitement to the otherwise maybe a bit &quot;dry&quot; NPS environment. And on top the &quot;Greenie Board&quot; comparison is by no means far-fetched...
Keep up the good work!

Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Adam, hello Rob,</p>
<p>what an excellent way to add some excitement to the otherwise maybe a bit &#8220;dry&#8221; NPS environment. And on top the &#8220;Greenie Board&#8221; comparison is by no means far-fetched&#8230;<br />
Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avoiding a Night in the Barrel: What businesses can learn from the US Navy Greenie Board by From Warship to Relationship &#8211; What the Navy can teach us about implementing Net Promoter — Golden Mean</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2012/01/avoiding-a-night-in-the-barrel-what-businesses-can-learn-from-the-us-navy-greenie-board/comment-page-1/#comment-6347</link>
		<dc:creator>From Warship to Relationship &#8211; What the Navy can teach us about implementing Net Promoter — Golden Mean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=2332#comment-6347</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the whole article and catch the video here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the whole article and catch the video here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avoiding a Night in the Barrel: What businesses can learn from the US Navy Greenie Board by Robert Kerner</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2012/01/avoiding-a-night-in-the-barrel-what-businesses-can-learn-from-the-us-navy-greenie-board/comment-page-1/#comment-6338</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=2332#comment-6338</guid>
		<description>Adam, 

Nice post, I also appreciate the comments supporting the men and women in the armed forces.  I would say if watching the video makes you a bit nervous, just remember that 365 nights a year somewhere in the world this is going on!

Don&#039;t forget the people that keep us safe next time you are cosy in bed with your family.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, </p>
<p>Nice post, I also appreciate the comments supporting the men and women in the armed forces.  I would say if watching the video makes you a bit nervous, just remember that 365 nights a year somewhere in the world this is going on!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget the people that keep us safe next time you are cosy in bed with your family.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by CustomerGauge News</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>CustomerGauge News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>Matt
that&#039;s an interesting question... I can&#039;t speak for the industry but I can tell you how we handle this on CustomerGauge now. 

First, we always try to send a survey in the recipients language. If we don&#039;t know it, we sometimes use some links at the top of the page, usually with images of flags to help navigation - one clients survey we did had four variants: English, German, Chinese and Japanese that were linked. Or we send in native language wherever possible - for example with another client we have 20+ language variants. Putting a survey in another language is relatively inexpensive, and I think should always be done. Do make sure it is approved by a local language speaker. 

Second, let&#039;s say you have a good translation of &quot;would you recommend&quot;. Even then, the meaning of &quot;recommend&quot; does not always have the same nuance in different cultures. So does this matter? Well, it matters if you want to compare the NPS scores of each country. It is one of a number of factors that determine cultural NPS differences. But if you are consistent, and keep asking the same question in the same way, you can do a single country benchmark. You might then choose to compare &quot;NPS improvement rate&quot; between countries. That will work well. As an example, on a continuous survey system you might say that a 1-point improvement per month might be a good start... Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt<br />
that&#8217;s an interesting question&#8230; I can&#8217;t speak for the industry but I can tell you how we handle this on CustomerGauge now. </p>
<p>First, we always try to send a survey in the recipients language. If we don&#8217;t know it, we sometimes use some links at the top of the page, usually with images of flags to help navigation &#8211; one clients survey we did had four variants: English, German, Chinese and Japanese that were linked. Or we send in native language wherever possible &#8211; for example with another client we have 20+ language variants. Putting a survey in another language is relatively inexpensive, and I think should always be done. Do make sure it is approved by a local language speaker. </p>
<p>Second, let&#8217;s say you have a good translation of &#8220;would you recommend&#8221;. Even then, the meaning of &#8220;recommend&#8221; does not always have the same nuance in different cultures. So does this matter? Well, it matters if you want to compare the NPS scores of each country. It is one of a number of factors that determine cultural NPS differences. But if you are consistent, and keep asking the same question in the same way, you can do a single country benchmark. You might then choose to compare &#8220;NPS improvement rate&#8221; between countries. That will work well. As an example, on a continuous survey system you might say that a 1-point improvement per month might be a good start&#8230; Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by Matt</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>One slightly different question.
Does the language of the survey affect how the &quot;would you recommend&quot; question is interpreted?

For example, if I send a survey in English to someone in say, Japan, (who speaks English but not as a first language), will they still understand what is being asked?
Interested in opinions and any studies done.

Yes, I know ideally the survey is in the receivers native language.

Thanks,
--Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One slightly different question.<br />
Does the language of the survey affect how the &#8220;would you recommend&#8221; question is interpreted?</p>
<p>For example, if I send a survey in English to someone in say, Japan, (who speaks English but not as a first language), will they still understand what is being asked?<br />
Interested in opinions and any studies done.</p>
<p>Yes, I know ideally the survey is in the receivers native language.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
&#8211;Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by Peter</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>There are definitely national biases over where &quot;acceptable&quot; sits in a 10 point scale - my own experience with the Dutch is that they are slightly influenced by their standard school and university results scheme which is biased up for socio-economic reasons in some situations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_the_Netherlands

They use a linear 1-10 scale which has a modal value, across the entire population of students, which sits somewhere between 6.5 and 7.5. This modal value might be construed as a their popular conception of &quot;adequate&quot;.

Due to population bias, more highly educated people only have experience of modal values (in their school/educational experience which is heavily streamed/separated from a fairly early age) of something significantly higher, which I estimate to sit somewhere between 7.5 to 8. Again perhaps the socially-constructed conception of &quot;adequate&quot;. I have noted that highly-educated Dutch people do tend to actually give higher scores for &quot;adequate&quot; than I was used to (my &quot;adequate&quot; sits smack bang at 5.5 :-)

Even so, NPS that does not include 8s as promoters should not be seriously impacted by this &quot;shove&quot;, and I&#039;d expect that the Dutch socio-economic modal biases don&#039;t really have a significant impact on NPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are definitely national biases over where &#8220;acceptable&#8221; sits in a 10 point scale &#8211; my own experience with the Dutch is that they are slightly influenced by their standard school and university results scheme which is biased up for socio-economic reasons in some situations:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_the_Netherlands" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_the_Netherlands</a></p>
<p>They use a linear 1-10 scale which has a modal value, across the entire population of students, which sits somewhere between 6.5 and 7.5. This modal value might be construed as a their popular conception of &#8220;adequate&#8221;.</p>
<p>Due to population bias, more highly educated people only have experience of modal values (in their school/educational experience which is heavily streamed/separated from a fairly early age) of something significantly higher, which I estimate to sit somewhere between 7.5 to 8. Again perhaps the socially-constructed conception of &#8220;adequate&#8221;. I have noted that highly-educated Dutch people do tend to actually give higher scores for &#8220;adequate&#8221; than I was used to (my &#8220;adequate&#8221; sits smack bang at 5.5 <img src='http://customergauge.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Even so, NPS that does not include 8s as promoters should not be seriously impacted by this &#8220;shove&#8221;, and I&#8217;d expect that the Dutch socio-economic modal biases don&#8217;t really have a significant impact on NPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by Mark Schepers</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Schepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>Do the Dutch really don’t give out 10’s? Working for the Dutch brand of an international Automotive service company I can’t agree with that. With over 63.000 surveys completed this year so far, 45% rate our service with a 10 and a more 20% with a 9.

When you deliver good service, the Dutch (or any other) are more than happy to give you a good rating.
So is there really a ‘Dutch’ effect? There just might well be.  When I’m convinced  that I’m not going to get a 10 anyway, am I then willing to go the extra mile? ‘When I’m a customer, I don’t get a 10 service, so why should I be the one exception’?

Making compromises  is so embedded in the Dutch culture that often Management (and by default also their employees) are reluctant to make the decision to delight and engage their customers their number one priority.
It’s this psychological blockade which I believe is the real ‘Dutch’ effect.

And for those who are curious how our Dutch brand compares to our international brands? Out of 16 countries measuring NPS, we are last with a NPS of 60. So I guess other cultures give out 10’s as well…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Dutch really don’t give out 10’s? Working for the Dutch brand of an international Automotive service company I can’t agree with that. With over 63.000 surveys completed this year so far, 45% rate our service with a 10 and a more 20% with a 9.</p>
<p>When you deliver good service, the Dutch (or any other) are more than happy to give you a good rating.<br />
So is there really a ‘Dutch’ effect? There just might well be.  When I’m convinced  that I’m not going to get a 10 anyway, am I then willing to go the extra mile? ‘When I’m a customer, I don’t get a 10 service, so why should I be the one exception’?</p>
<p>Making compromises  is so embedded in the Dutch culture that often Management (and by default also their employees) are reluctant to make the decision to delight and engage their customers their number one priority.<br />
It’s this psychological blockade which I believe is the real ‘Dutch’ effect.</p>
<p>And for those who are curious how our Dutch brand compares to our international brands? Out of 16 countries measuring NPS, we are last with a NPS of 60. So I guess other cultures give out 10’s as well…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by Nils Schmeling</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Schmeling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion. I recognize the discussions Adam made in most of our customer excellence discussions with lots of customers.
It&#039;s our identical experience that users first think that they never would rate a 10. It seems to be a kind of natural reaction to first dive into the NPS measurement system. My experience that after that it beatens the path to show that it&#039;s all about the trend, improving the NPS score on your scale in stead of discussing the  method. 

Another experience we have: The Dutch are perfectly capable of ration 9&#039;s and 10&#039;s in NPS survey&#039;s! Adam, good article, it&#039;s all about improving the service en focus on your actions to improve it. Fortunatley Fred designed NPS which most people already feel it&#039;s right, they only have to admit it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion. I recognize the discussions Adam made in most of our customer excellence discussions with lots of customers.<br />
It&#8217;s our identical experience that users first think that they never would rate a 10. It seems to be a kind of natural reaction to first dive into the NPS measurement system. My experience that after that it beatens the path to show that it&#8217;s all about the trend, improving the NPS score on your scale in stead of discussing the  method. </p>
<p>Another experience we have: The Dutch are perfectly capable of ration 9&#8242;s and 10&#8242;s in NPS survey&#8217;s! Adam, good article, it&#8217;s all about improving the service en focus on your actions to improve it. Fortunatley Fred designed NPS which most people already feel it&#8217;s right, they only have to admit it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Promoter: Is there a &#8220;Dutch Effect&#8221;? by ankie straathof</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/03/net-promoter-is-there-a-dutch-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>ankie straathof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=1877#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>I guess it is always easier to discuss the method of measurement instead of listening to the voice of the customer.  If that visualises our  dutch culture well.... shame on us! Our customer services is based on the idea that 75% is fantastic, the same number for employeesatisfaction... it seems we are not prepared the extra miles in the idea of losing the delicate balance of costs and profit. 
Well i can tell them this, do your math again... this costs more... And don&#039;t forget if only one rises up to an outstanding level the loss of customers of the competitors will be massive.. That will truely create financial unbalance! It&#039;s better to be the first!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it is always easier to discuss the method of measurement instead of listening to the voice of the customer.  If that visualises our  dutch culture well&#8230;. shame on us! Our customer services is based on the idea that 75% is fantastic, the same number for employeesatisfaction&#8230; it seems we are not prepared the extra miles in the idea of losing the delicate balance of costs and profit.<br />
Well i can tell them this, do your math again&#8230; this costs more&#8230; And don&#8217;t forget if only one rises up to an outstanding level the loss of customers of the competitors will be massive.. That will truely create financial unbalance! It&#8217;s better to be the first!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CustomerGauge Internet-Connected &#8220;AnalogGauge&#8221; shows Net Promoter® Score in Real Time by Greg</title>
		<link>http://customergauge.com/2011/06/customergauge-internet-connected-analoggauge-shows-net-promoter%c2%ae-score-in-real-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://customergauge.com/?p=2061#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Hi guys &#039;n&#039; gals

We are DESPERATE for a more catchy name for &quot;Transactional NPS&quot; before roll-out, yet we don&#039;t want to &#039;pinch&#039; another corporation&#039;s term, like &#039;Pulse Survey&#039; or &#039;Pulse Score&#039;. Can you steer me in the right direction, before one of our team members reaches for Roget&#039;s Thesaurus?

Thanks for your time,
Greg
tel. +61 2 9857 1886</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys &#8216;n&#8217; gals</p>
<p>We are DESPERATE for a more catchy name for &#8220;Transactional NPS&#8221; before roll-out, yet we don&#8217;t want to &#8216;pinch&#8217; another corporation&#8217;s term, like &#8216;Pulse Survey&#8217; or &#8216;Pulse Score&#8217;. Can you steer me in the right direction, before one of our team members reaches for Roget&#8217;s Thesaurus?</p>
<p>Thanks for your time,<br />
Greg<br />
tel. +61 2 9857 1886</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

